linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock
@ 2024-01-23  6:43 Suren Baghdasaryan
  2024-01-26  2:04 ` Andrew Morton
  2024-03-25  4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Suren Baghdasaryan @ 2024-01-23  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm
  Cc: linux-s390, x86, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, surenb, Russell King, linux-riscv,
	palmer, willy, luto, agordeev, will, gerald.schaefer,
	linux-arm-kernel

The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting
for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM
architecture fault accounting.

[1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock")

Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock")

Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index e96fb40b9cc3..07565b593ed6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		goto done;
 	}
 	count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_RETRY);
+	if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR)
+		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
 
 	/* Quick path to respond to signals */
 	if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) {
-- 
2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock
  2024-01-23  6:43 [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
@ 2024-01-26  2:04 ` Andrew Morton
  2024-01-26  2:19   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
  2024-03-25  4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-01-26  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suren Baghdasaryan
  Cc: linux-s390, x86, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Russell King, linux-riscv, palmer,
	willy, luto, agordeev, will, gerald.schaefer, linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:43:05 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:

> The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting
> for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM
> architecture fault accounting.
> 
> [1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock")
> 
> Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock")

What are the userspace-visible runtime effects of this change?

Is a cc:stable backport desirable?

> Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock
  2024-01-26  2:04 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2024-01-26  2:19   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Suren Baghdasaryan @ 2024-01-26  2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-s390, x86, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Russell King, linux-riscv, palmer,
	willy, luto, agordeev, will, gerald.schaefer, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:04 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:43:05 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting
> > for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM
> > architecture fault accounting.
> >
> > [1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock")
> >
> > Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock")
>
> What are the userspace-visible runtime effects of this change?

The user-visible effects is that it restores correct major fault
accounting that was broken after [2] was merged in 6.7 kernel. The
more detailed description is in [3] and this patch simply adds the
same fix to ARM architecture which I missed in [3]. I can re-send the
patch with the full description from [3] if needed.

>
> Is a cc:stable backport desirable?

Yes, I guess since [2] was merged in 6.7, cc-ing stable would be desirable.
Please let me know if you want me to re-send the patch with full
description and CC'ing stable.

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231006195318.4087158-6-willy@infradead.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231226214610.109282-1-surenb@google.com/

>
> > Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock
  2024-01-23  6:43 [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
  2024-01-26  2:04 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2024-03-25  4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv @ 2024-03-25  4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suren Baghdasaryan
  Cc: linux-s390, agordeev, x86, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	linuxppc-dev, willy, linux-kernel, rmk+kernel, palmer, luto,
	linux-riscv, gerald.schaefer, will, akpm, linux-arm-kernel

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:43:05 -0800 you wrote:
> The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting
> for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM
> architecture fault accounting.
> 
> [1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock")
> 
> Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock")
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e870920bbe68

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-25  4:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-23  6:43 [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-01-26  2:04 ` Andrew Morton
2024-01-26  2:19   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-03-25  4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).