From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Merging ppc32 and ppc64
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:07:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17136.13558.773102.465379@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
At OLS I discussed the idea of merging the ppc32 and ppc64
architectures in the Linux kernel with various ppc32 and ppc64 kernel
hackers and users. There was broad agreement that this would be a
good thing to do, so we are going to go ahead and do it.
The plan is to create include/asm-powerpc and arch/powerpc directories
for the merged architecture and move stuff in there as it gets
merged. The existing ppc32 and ppc64 directories will stay around
until they are no longer useful. The intention is not to break
anything that currently works; however, we do not plan to move unused
and unmaintained platforms into the merged architecture.
The advantage of merging is that it will reduce the maintenance effort
and reduce the instances where a common bug gets fixed in one
architecture but not the other. It will also make it easier to
support 64-bit embedded systems as they become more common.
I don't see the merge as changing the actual code that gets executed
on any given platform very much, except in one respect: we are going
to standardize on a flattened device tree as the way that information
about the platform gets passed from the boot loader to the kernel.
Comments? Flames? :)
Paul.
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-03 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-03 3:07 Paul Mackerras [this message]
2005-08-03 5:48 ` Fwd: Merging ppc32 and ppc64 Kumar Gala
2005-08-08 17:59 ` Joel Schopp
2005-08-08 23:48 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 13:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 13:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-08-09 13:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 14:12 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-08-09 15:01 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 16:21 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 17:41 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 18:49 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 15:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 22:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 23:00 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-10 10:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 14:52 ` Olof Johansson
2005-08-09 22:48 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-10 10:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-04 2:37 Goodman, Brad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17136.13558.773102.465379@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).