From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17183.48543.616634.628331@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 14:27:11 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Marcelo Tosatti In-Reply-To: <20050908005821.GB8882@dmt.cnet> References: <20050907230324.GC7513@dmt.cnet> <1126139332.29803.0.camel@gaston> <00a1f47bb2edbbc001c2267191aa36f0@embeddededge.com> <20050908005821.GB8882@dmt.cnet> Cc: linux-ppc-embedded Subject: Re: [PATCH] add big endian version of ld_/st_ IO access macros and convert main 8xx code to use it List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Marcelo Tosatti writes: > eieio/isync are not required. There's no need to execute redudant > instructions and occupy kernel space. Given how long it takes to access I/O devices, I don't believe an extra instruction or two is going to make a measurable difference. Feel free to show me measurements proving me wrong, of course... :) Paul.