From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17489.50396.320494.589703@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:31:40 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wire up *at syscalls In-Reply-To: <1145924011.16166.465.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> References: <1145924011.16166.465.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse writes: > Hm, do we really need that? How about something based on this instead... > note that I used CONFIG_PPC_CELL because dependencies on CONFIG_*_MODULE > in the static kernel are evil. Nice idea, but you didn't change the syscall entry path to multiply the syscall number by 24 instead of 16. It would be nice to have a way to do something like that but generate two separate tables instead of a single table with 3 entries per syscall. Paul.