From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17531.28154.10836.832225@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:56:10 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Michal Ostrowski Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/8] Overhaul of virt IRQ configuration. / Kill ppc64_interrupt_controller. In-Reply-To: <1148935262.25048.31.camel@brick> References: <1148935262.25048.31.camel@brick> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Michal Ostrowski writes: > Platforms can choose the default configuration (which is to > say identity mappings of IRQ vectors 0..511) or specify their own > configuration: an offset (for ISA vectors), the range that is to be Given that the decree has come down from on high that irq 0 is always to mean "none" or "no IRQ", I have been thinking that we should use the ISA offset everywhere, even on machines without any ISA hardware. Paul.