From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17646.62392.318654.762210@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:57:28 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: emulate power5 popcntb instruction In-Reply-To: <9FF8F72E-5990-4AED-A826-9E1C9C889DB6@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1155840829.9659.16.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> <200608182105.45264.arnd@arndb.de> <50883.84.105.60.119.1156014614.squirrel@gate.crashing.org> <200608192219.03178.arnd@arndb.de> <37280.84.105.60.119.1156030372.squirrel@gate.crashing.org> <1156190965.9659.41.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> <17645.18647.720814.903612@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <9FF8F72E-5990-4AED-A826-9E1C9C889DB6@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, arnd@arndb.de, segher@gate.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool writes: > Like I asked before -- should we run this emulation on 32-bit > machines at all? The instruction only exists in the 64-bit > architecture after all. It could be argued either way, but on the whole I would prefer to minimize the number of things which could cause a 32-bit program that runs quite happily on a 64-bit CPU to fail on a 32-bit CPU... Paul.