From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17675.30508.252375.59449@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:01:48 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: "Mark A. Greer" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] bootwrapper: arch/powerpc/boot code reorg In-Reply-To: <20060915180129.GE1884@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20060719230014.GB3887@mag.az.mvista.com> <20060908033508.GA5203@mag.az.mvista.com> <17674.32333.958250.868794@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20060915180129.GE1884@mag.az.mvista.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mark A. Greer writes: > Yes. Whether you pass the NULL or not hinges on whether its flat tree > or not so I made it a dt_op. What are you thinking? There's basically only two cases: if we have a builtin flat tree, we pass that and NULL in r5; if we don't, and we have OF, we pass NULL in r3 and the OF entry point in r5. I think that could be handled in main.c. We also lost the "enforce minimum address only for 64-bit" thing in the translation, too. I believe that just patch 1/6 on its own won't give us a working zImage, so we'll have to split up the changes differently when it comes time to check this stuff in to git. Paul.