From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17725.18623.768768.438157@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:57:03 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Matt Sealey Subject: Re: [PATCH] General CHRP/MPC5K2 Platform and drivers support - to comment In-Reply-To: <453CD615.4050401@genesi-usa.com> References: <453771E5.4090808@bplan-gmbh.de> <77AD49CA-69CB-4ADA-B8F3-3BC3A066BCF9@kernel.crashing.org> <453884F5.4000804@bplan-gmbh.de> <122A4E06-B8A6-4256-B96E-3811EA93EA25@kernel.crashing.org> <453B6A84.3050209@bplan-gmbh.de> <1161585371.10524.444.camel@localhost.localdomain> <453CD615.4050401@genesi-usa.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt Sealey writes: > It confused me even before, because ppc and ppc64 have also been > used to support real POWER (with a capital P, O, W, E and R) processors, > and now these are lumped in with powerpc which is no better than > ppc64 in these terms? "PowerPC" is the name of the instruction set architecture, "POWER" is the name of some specific implementations of the PowerPC architecture made by a certain large multinational computer company. Unless you're talking about the really really old ISA that was the predecessor of PowerPC, that is. :) Paul.