From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17834.60612.793025.590958@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:53:56 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix performance monitor exception in 2.6.20-series In-Reply-To: <1168828808.9415.278.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> References: <20070113154029.GA32292@eecg.toronto.edu> <1168734544.5011.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1168828808.9415.278.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Cc: Livio Soares , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse writes: > If we can _make_ it safe, and in doing so avoid the failure mode where > the machine locks up with interrupts disabled and then the PMU resets > itself entirely (including the date), that might be a good thing... Different PMU, I think; they are talking about the Performance Monitor Unit in POWERx cpus. Paul.