From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17847.12237.166954.453166@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:07:09 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Vitaly Bordug Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [POWERPC] cpm2: CPM2 interrupt controller fix In-Reply-To: <20070123004203.5a3007fa@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070113004150.1224.58427.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <17844.35471.554647.189851@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070122164316.79569af9@localhost.localdomain> <1169495737.1582.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070122235533.6f9f8d09@localhost.localdomain> <1169500388.1582.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070123004203.5a3007fa@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I just tried to compile up the ads8272_defconfig with ARCH=ppc, since that was the only obviously 8272-based config in arch/ppc/configs. However, arch/ppc/platforms/mpc8272ads_setup.c fails to compile because of things like this in it (line 106): static void init_fcc1_ioports(struct fs_platform_info*) { ... } That is, it's a function definition (not declaration) with the parameter name missing, which gcc rejects with an error. Gitk tells me it's been like this since September. Is there any 8272-based config that actually still compiles with ARCH=ppc? Paul.