From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17848.6331.164992.951431@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:40:59 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] Include autoconf.h from the bootwrapper. In-Reply-To: <56B86A8F-4E40-4C58-A774-0DE3C7AA8CE2@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070124210654.GA10527@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070124235150.GA26212@localhost.localdomain> <56B86A8F-4E40-4C58-A774-0DE3C7AA8CE2@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala writes: > I think the problem is how to resolve the variations of the u-boot/ > ppcboot bd_t that changes from board to board and based on config. The wrapper should be able to build bootable images for any of the boards, that is, for any given bd_t variant, there should be a flag to wrapper that tells it to build an image that understands that variant. It's reasonable for arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile to pass different flags to wrapper depending on the kernel config. I don't want wrapper itself, or anything it uses, to be config-dependent. Paul.