From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17964.42216.839568.476369@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:22:00 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Jake Moilanen Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA 4GB boundary protection In-Reply-To: <1175175842.1398.54.camel@goblue> References: <1172872183.5310.145.camel@goblue> <20070303232915.GB8028@lixom.net> <1174511149.5225.135.camel@goblue> <20070322175324.GA21120@lixom.net> <1175026241.1398.23.camel@goblue> <20070328155635.GA14356@lixom.net> <1175105842.1398.43.camel@goblue> <1175124183.32220.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1175175842.1398.54.camel@goblue> Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jake, It looks like I have applied both the final version of this patch (569975591c5530fdc9c7a3c45122e5e46f075a74) and the original version (618d3adc351a24c4c48437c767befb88ca2d199d) that modified iommu_range_alloc(). Should I revert the original version? Paul.