From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17965.37623.561459.64174@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:17:43 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] bootwrapper: Add ppcboot.h. In-Reply-To: <20070417090342.3E736352658@atlas.denx.de> References: <20070416232553.GB26693@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070417090342.3E736352658@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfgang Denk writes: > Shouldn't we finally get this straight and call the file "u-boot.h" as > it is called in U-Boot? Is it identical to the one in U-Boot? Paul.