From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17965.39866.351929.349735@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:55:06 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc pseries eeh: Convert to kthread API In-Reply-To: <20070422123155.GF20763@infradead.org> References: <11769695763104-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <20070422123155.GF20763@infradead.org> Cc: ", linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , containers@lists.osdl.org, Oleg Nesterov List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Christoph Hellwig writes: > The first question is obviously, is this really something we want? > spawning kernel thread on demand without reaping them properly seems > quite dangerous. What specifically has to be done to reap a kernel thread? Are you concerned about the number of threads, or about having zombies hanging around? Paul.