From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18039.30713.948665.48880@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:30:17 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: for-2.6.23 branch in powerpc.git created In-Reply-To: <4672D694.5060701@freescale.com> References: <18034.6787.951861.623265@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4672D694.5060701@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood writes: > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > These two i2c patches: > > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037327.html > > This looks OK as an interim measure, though at some point I'd like to > get around to letting both devices and drivers specify a list of match > names. > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037328.html > > I'd leave out the device_type, and the "rtc" in "rtc-r5c372" is > redundant if that's all the r5c372 chip does, but other than that it > looks good. > > > also would be nice to get in, although, they only make sense with an ack > > from Scott Wood and another patch from him, as explained in links above... > > I assume you mean "Call of_register_i2c_devices() for fsl-i2c" > (http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-May/036333.html)? Isn't that the one where you replied to yourself saying you'd posted the wrong patch? Did you ever post the right patch? Paul.