From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18162.1.982956.610996@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:07:13 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Domen Puncer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms In-Reply-To: <20070919051157.GH32628@nd47.coderock.org> References: <20070711093113.GE4375@moe.telargo.com> <20070711093220.GF4375@moe.telargo.com> <20070806065857.GN4529@moe.telargo.com> <18160.39896.132391.625791@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070919051157.GH32628@nd47.coderock.org> Cc: David Brownell , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sylvain Munaut List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Domen Puncer writes: > 52xx > Reason for adding it to all was that EXPORT_SYMBOL's would clash if > one were to add clk support for another platform. What I meant was, why aren't you using a config symbol so that we don't build it on platforms that don't need any "clk" support at all? Paul.