From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18190.52379.97647.468384@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:23:39 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Switch to generic WARN_ON()/BUG_ON() In-Reply-To: <20071011171413.GC10877@lixom.net> References: <20071011171211.GB10877@lixom.net> <20071011171413.GC10877@lixom.net> Cc: grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyle@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Olof Johansson writes: > Not using the ppc-specific WARN_ON/BUG_ON constructs actually saves about > 4K text on a ppc64_defconfig. The main reason seems to be that prepping > the arguments to the conditional trap instructions is more work than > just doing a compare and branch. It might be more instructions but it takes fewer cycles, I would expect. Do you have the actual instruction sequences to compare? Paul.