From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18373.60272.351572.363687@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:00:00 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: patchwork missing patches? In-Reply-To: <20080227093950.11c8f4af@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20080227093950.11c8f4af@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jk@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer writes: > I'm trying to find some patches that went to the list recently in > patchwork and they seem to be missing. Here are a few: > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052196.html That one was in "awaiting upstream" state since I put it in the bundle, then realized it should probably go through your tree, and didn't apply it. I've put it back to "new" state now. > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052164.html I seem to recall putting that one in "changes requested" state, but now I can't find it either. Strange... > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052129.html Not sure where that one has gone. > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052050.html I have been deleting patches that go through other maintainers to try to keep the number of patches down to a manageable level, and that includes ibm_newemac patches, since they go through Jeff Garzik. That's probably what happened to this one. I'll leave ibm_newemac patches alone if you promise to clean them up periodically. :) Paul.