From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18721.60712.438025.564030@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:16:08 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: Large stack usage in fs code (especially for PPC64) In-Reply-To: References: Cc: LKML , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Steven Rostedt writes: > Here's my stack after boot up with CONFIG_IRQSTACKS set. Seems that > softirqs still use the same stack as the process. They shouldn't. I don't see do_softirq in the trace, though. Which functions did you think would be run in a softirq? It looks to me like the deepest 10 or so functions are called at hard irq level, within hrtimer_interrupt called from timer_interrupt. > root@electra ~> cat /debug/tracing/stack_trace > Depth Size Location (59 entries) > ----- ---- -------- > 0) 12384 192 ftrace_call+0x4/0x14 > 1) 12192 128 .sched_clock+0x20/0x60 > 2) 12064 128 .sched_clock_cpu+0x34/0x50 > 3) 11936 144 .cpu_clock+0x3c/0xa0 > 4) 11792 144 .get_timestamp+0x2c/0x50 > 5) 11648 144 .__touch_softlockup_watchdog+0x3c/0x60 > 6) 11504 192 .softlockup_tick+0xe4/0x220 > 7) 11312 128 .run_local_timers+0x34/0x50 > 8) 11184 160 .update_process_times+0x44/0xb0 > 9) 11024 176 .tick_sched_timer+0x8c/0x120 > 10) 10848 160 .__run_hrtimer+0xd8/0x130 > 11) 10688 240 .hrtimer_interrupt+0x16c/0x220 > 12) 10448 160 .timer_interrupt+0xcc/0x110 > 13) 10288 96 decrementer_common+0xe0/0x100 Paul.