linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@motorola.com>
To: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Stephen Williams <612dlag102@sneakemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] "indirect" DCR access (40x, BookE)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:25:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1921A482-7431-11D8-AFB6-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312045451.GA25876@gate.ebshome.net>


Look in u-boot.  They have some user commands that allow
reading/writing dcr's.  These commands are written with self modifying
code, I would recommend that we reuse that.

Also, it begs the question of should this be extended to SPRs, not that
I have come across a case with SPRs that I need to iterate over a large
list.

- kumar

On Mar 11, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Eugene Surovegin wrote:

>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:44:09PM -0800, Stephen Williams wrote:
>>>> I think you should just write it as self modifying code :-)
>>>> Write the instruction with the DCR number and just execute it.
>>>
>>>
>>> And deal with locking and icache/dcache coherency ?
>>>
>>> No, thanks :)
>>
>>
>> Actually, I recall that there is a code fixup mechanism that
>> is invoked early in kernel init that does exactly that: it
>> manages some machine specific differences by editing the code
>> in place in a safe way.
>
> Yes, you are correct, but this is done only once during startup and
> nobody cares how fast it is. BTW, there is no locking issues at this
> stage.
>
> I'm not saying that it's impossible :). It's just not very efficient
> to do such stuff on run-time (lock a spinlock, change memory, dcache
> flush, icache invalidate, isync...)
>
> Eugene.
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-12 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-12  1:48 [RFC] "indirect" DCR access (40x, BookE) Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-12  2:46 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-12  3:05   ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-12  4:44     ` Stephen Williams
2004-03-12  4:54       ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-12 14:25         ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2004-03-12 14:53           ` Chuck Meade
2004-03-12 16:20           ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-12 18:01           ` Dan Malek
2004-03-19  4:00           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-23  2:47             ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01  5:36               ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1921A482-7431-11D8-AFB6-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com \
    --to=kumar.gala@motorola.com \
    --cc=612dlag102@sneakemail.com \
    --cc=ebs@ebshome.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).