linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@linuxcare.com.au>, <cort@hq.fsmlabs.com>
Subject: PCI rework & CHRP question
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:57:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19340818162914.6020@192.168.1.10> (raw)


I'm working on a rework of our arch/pci.c (to properly handle multiple
host bridges, and various other cleanups).

In the chrp_pci.c code, I found this code:

        if ( !strncmp("MOT",
                      get_property(find_path_device("/"), "model", NULL),3) )
        {
                pci_dram_offset = 0;
                isa_mem_base = 0xf7000000;
                isa_io_base = 0xfe000000;
                set_config_access_method(grackle);
        }

However, I found no way in the Grackle documentation to have isa_mem_base
at 0xf7000000. AFAIK, it's at 0xfd000000

Also, the grackle access method expect a PCI bridge structure configured
with the ioremap'ed config space registers, which is not the case on
chrp. (They are defined only in pmac_pci.c).

I'm fixing those along with my changes. I suppose Grackle on CHRP uses
memory map B ?

Note (tell me if it's a problem), that I'm removing the various
xxx_setup_pci_ptrs(). Each host bridge has a pci_controler structure (the
old bridge_data) that contains also the function pointers to the access
methods. Archs now call whatever xxx_find_bridges from their
xxx_setup_arch() function and all host-bridge dependent setup is done there.

I will push those changes in the new linuxppc_2_5 bk tree as soon as I'm
happy with them.

Ben.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-09-23 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-09-23 22:57 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2000-09-25  2:00 ` PCI rework & CHRP question Cort Dougan
2000-09-25  7:16   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19340818162914.6020@192.168.1.10 \
    --to=bh40@calva.net \
    --cc=cort@hq.fsmlabs.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paulus@linuxcare.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).