linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Choosing an Ethernet controller...
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:26:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990118202600.009236@mail.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990118095104.18478A-100000@persephone.cs.nmt.edu>


I know this is a little bit out-of-topic, but I'm sure someone on this
list can answer and I didn't really know how to actually ask this...

For an embedded developement, I have to choose among 3 different PCI
ethernet controllers. A DEC/Intel 21143 (Tulip), an AMD79C971 (PCNet32)
or a SMC83C171 (Epic100).

The processor will not be a PPC but a StrongARM. (we proposed a PPC, but
the client wanted a StrongARM).
All three seems to be supported by Linux, I will use a 2.0.x kernel at
first, on a StrongARM, but we plan to move to 2.2 once it's stable enough.

Are there any known problems with one of those chips ? Is someone aware
of any specific problem with one of those beasts or it's linux driver ? 

Which one would you choose ?

Thanks !


-- 
           E-Mail: <mailto:bh40@calva.net>
BenH.      Web   : <http://calvaweb.calvacom.fr/bh40/>





[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]

      parent reply	other threads:[~1999-01-18 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.990114142507.7102A-200000@persephone.cs.nmt.edu>
1999-01-14 22:35 ` new irq.c Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-01-18  1:19   ` MCLK=100 breaks PowerBook Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-01-18  9:00     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-01-18 16:51       ` Cort Dougan
1999-01-18 17:04         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-01-19  0:47           ` Paul Mackerras
1999-01-19 12:35             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-01-18 19:26         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990118202600.009236@mail.mipsys.com \
    --to=bh40@calva.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).