From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <19990120133518.G2459@maxime.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:35:18 +0100 From: Sven LUTHER To: Geert Uytterhoeven , luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr Cc: Michel Daenzer , nardinoc@CS.UniBO.IT, Linux/APUS , Linux/PPC Development , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development Subject: Re: [pm2fb] update 990110 - first public release ;) Reply-To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr References: <19990120120240.B2072@maxime.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Geert Uytterhoeven on Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 01:17:16PM +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 01:17:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > but then since i first booted in this mode, the bottom line of the > > screen don't get erased anymore, very anoying, particularly > > because it worked fine before. > > I guess a problem with the clear_margins routine? > > > also, Ilario and Geert, am i right in thinking that the pm2fb > > initialize the permedia2 chip correclty, and that, when trying to > > accelerate X i could use it directly, without having to do > > initialization. > > Yes. The X server must not do video mode initialization, but call the frame > buffer device instead. what then is the stuff you initialize in the mach64 accel init stuff ? Friendly, Sven LUTHER [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]