From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:58:04 -0800 Message-Id: <199901210758.XAA14846@dm.cobaltmicro.com> From: "David S. Miller" To: Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be CC: davies@maniac.ultranet.com, becker@cesdis1.gsfc.nasa.gov, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org In-reply-to: (message from Geert Uytterhoeven on Wed, 20 Jan 1999 22:28:13 +0100 (CET)) Subject: Re: de4x5 vs. tulip on PPC References: Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 22:28:13 +0100 (CET) From: Geert Uytterhoeven On my machine, de4x5.c works, while tulip.c doesn't. Machine is a CHRP/PPC box, Ethernet is 21041 based D-Link DE-530CT. ... So at least the Ethernet HW address is in the wrong endiannes for tulip.c. Are there people who can use tulip.c on a big endian machine? Nope, I gave up a long time ago using anything other than de4x5.c on sparc machines. Later, David S. Miller davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]