linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Harrington <tph@rmi.net>
To: robin@louis.bidmc.harvard.edu (Robin Colgrove)
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Linux and Mac together (Was: Re: mac-on-linux project status)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 17:55:16 -0700 (MST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199901250055.RAA20183@shell.rmi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36AB7411.F40DFF97@louis.bidmc.harvard.edu> from "Robin Colgrove" at Jan 24, 99 02:28:22 pm


 
> Maybe I am just not understanding this but if both MkLinux and OS X run on 
> top of the Mach microkernel, could they both be running simultaneously? If 
> so, I could imagine using OS X (not OS X server) as my desktop OS while 
> on the same machine MkLinux was taking care of the internet server things 
> in the background. I do not need super high performance stuff since I 
> only "host" a few dozen pretty low-intensity users.  Right now I get by on 
> shareware tools (Quid Pro Quo, Rumor Mill, OTChat, NCSATelnet, Eudora 
> Internet Mail Server) but I am reaching the limits of what I can do with 
> these.

In principle, yes,  Mach is capable of running multiple server operating 
systems at the same time.  I have no idea what's involved in making this
happen, but supposedly one of the advantges of a microkernel-based Linux
(like MkLinux or L4Linux) is that you can run one Linux kernel while
debugging another one simultaneously.  You may have trouble, though, if
Apple is using a different version of Mach than MkLinux does, or if Apple
has stuck some MacOS X Server-specific things into their Mach code.

I really can't help you beyond suggesting that the MkLinux mailing lists
might be a better place to ask.  If you succeed, though, I'd be very
interested in hearing about it.  Good luck.  :-)

Depending on how urgent your needs are and how much MacOS you need vs. 
server stuff, you might be better off waiting for SheepShaver on Linux.


[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]

  reply	other threads:[~1999-01-25  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-01-24  3:48 mac-on-linux project status Samuel Rydh
1999-01-24 19:28 ` Linux and Mac together (Was: Re: mac-on-linux project status) Robin Colgrove
1999-01-25  0:55   ` Tom Harrington [this message]
1999-01-25  5:11     ` Ken Roberts
1999-01-25 15:47       ` David A. Gatwood
1999-01-25  1:14 ` mac-on-linux project status Tom Harrington
1999-01-25 15:12   ` Samuel Rydh
1999-01-25 17:44     ` David Edelsohn
1999-01-25 19:21     ` Tom Harrington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199901250055.RAA20183@shell.rmi.net \
    --to=tph@rmi.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=robin@louis.bidmc.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).