linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Joseph Woodhead <ira@wrath.iatlas.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: ira@wrath.iatlas.com
Subject: pre-R5 deficiencies
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:07:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199901262207.RAA06012@wrath.iatlas.com> (raw)



Hi all,

Perhaps I'm rehashing something but I couldn't find it searching the
archives, so:

What is the reasoning behind including a findutils in pre-R5 that has no
updatedb binary?? It even has scripts that use updatedb (cron jobs) but
no updatedb binary. Furthermore, 'rpm -qlp *.rpm' reveals that it is not
included in any package.

After quite a lot of effort installing pre-R5 a couple of weeks ago I
reverted back to my creaky barely-R4 from ages ago because I was so
shocked that the most useful tool for feeling your way in a new
installation was simply not there. It gives the impression of a very
not-ready product, which is counter to the impression I get from you
folks. 

I just checked back today after a couple of weeks to find a few packages
updated on 15 Jan, but not findutils.

Just curious!

Cheers,
ira

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]

             reply	other threads:[~1999-01-26 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-01-26 22:07 Ira Joseph Woodhead [this message]
1999-01-26 23:45 ` pre-R5 deficiencies Jeff Dubrule
1999-01-27  0:26 ` Matt McLean
1999-01-27  2:42 ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199901262207.RAA06012@wrath.iatlas.com \
    --to=ira@wrath.iatlas.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).