linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Are 7200s still *officially* supported?
@ 1999-02-13  2:50 Keith Jacob
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Keith Jacob @ 1999-02-13  2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev list


The subject really says it all: if kernel source releases always need 
patching to boot 7200s, does that mean that 7200s are no longer 
officially supported?

Either way, what needs patching in the 2.2.1 sources to boot a 7200? I 
looked thru' the recent suspect, linux/arch/ppc/kernel/head.S, "applied" 
the 2.2 patch, compiled it, but no go.

Thanks in advance if you can help here, (or just try to :-)

--
Keith Jacob
kjacob@wantree.com.au




[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1999-02-13  2:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-02-13  2:50 Are 7200s still *officially* supported? Keith Jacob

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).