From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 17:32:33 +0100 To: Cort Dougan , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Restructuring Efforts Message-Id: <19990217173233.029089@mail.mipsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Feb 16, 1999, Cort Dougan wrote: >With metered (and well behaved :) changes going into a linux/ppc cvs tree >I think that wouldn't be a problem. So I can get a handle on the scope of >things, how many people would want r/w access to a linux/ppc cvs tree? I would prefer that rather than one on vger. Many parts of Linux are still really obscure to me and I'm really afraid of breaking things. I prefer having to deal with two trees: an "official" one with qualified patches than can be tested by users and that will ultimately go to Linus, and a "developement" tree containing more cutting-edge stuffs. However, the problem that will quickly come from that is the difficulty to merge changes from the dev tree to vger, at least until 2.3.x is split. -- E-Mail: BenH. Web : [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]