From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:50:03 -0500 Message-Id: <199903121250.HAA18674@pc1.fred.org> From: "F. Heitkamp" To: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com CC: fheitka@ibm.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, hjl@varesearch.com In-reply-to: <4.2.0.25.19990311162952.03ed2b80@mail.lauterbach.com> (message from Franz Sirl on Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:37:18 +0100) Subject: Re: binutils-2.9.1.0.22b References: <4.2.0.25.19990311162952.03ed2b80@mail.lauterbach.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: X-Sender: fsirl-kernel@mail.lauterbach.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:37:18 +0100 From: Franz Sirl Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,hjl@varesearch.com (H.J. Lu) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hmm, are you sure you did everything right during configure/make? I have no problems with 22b on glibc-2.1 (R5) here. Just the usual ld testsuite FAILs: I've been using all the latest tools I can find (the usuall gettext, autoconf, automake etc. I also am using glibc-2.1. I would like to recompile it though, since the texinfo I had at the time was broken. I do get a problem in the math library that I sort of ignored. The system has been running mostly fine in spite of that error. I did not add any special options to configure, other than a --prefix=. I'll going to replace my kernel header files and try again. There may be a problem there. I'll let you know what happens. Any tips are greatly appreciated. Fred [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]