From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <199903161932.NAA24349@lists.linuxppc.org> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:33:00 -0500 From: "L. S." To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Cc: linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Where do we go from here? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: With Apple Computers coming into the arena of Linux(PPC) territory, and since LinuxPPC is playing on Apple's territory, and since Power Macintoshes--unlike IBM compatibles--are closed systems, what will happen when Apple changes hardware architectures to a degree that the specifications for Apple hardware are out of reach for LinuxPPC developers or reverse-enginneered so late that Apple is miles ahead with their Mach/BSD/Mac OS? See: Anyone can step on Micromaggot's foot, but Apple owns their own architecture. (I'm a long-time Apple user who maintained, configured, was in charge of an L. A. school Macintosh lab and AppleTalk network and also am studying Comp. Sci. Working closely with Macs and trying to get them to bend over backwards to act like secure, multi-user, network workstations made me sick. I also refused to learn ancient and doomed Macintosh APIs and needed a more challenging user experience. So, while waiting for years of promised, new OSes-of-the-month from Apple, I found MkLinux, first, then LinuxPPC. So, I'm slowly replacing Mac apps with LinuxPPC and its apps while starting to develop for LinuxPPC. That's why I ask. Pow!) L. S. :-| :-) ;-) :-) * [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]