From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 In-Reply-To: <36F69C36.9D5373CE@business.wm.edu> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:27:47 +0100 To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: smbfs and smbmount and Paul's 2.2.1 kernel Message-Id: <19990323132747.016080@mail.mipsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Mar 22, 1999, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: >To make smbfs work (I grabbed the src rpm and built it) I need to compile SMB >_FS into the kernel. I grabbed Paul's latest kernel source and dot.config >file >and noticed there was no support for SMB included in his kernel by default. > >Before I go and roll my own, has anyone played with mounting NT filesystems >using smbmount and smbumount commands? Is this stable on linuxppc? Are there >any gotchas I should look out for with this filesystem? I use it regulary, compiled as a module, and it seems to work (but displays tons of messages in the active console). I had to compile recent version of smbmount (from a 2.0 samba package, If I remember correctly), the ones bundled with R4 didn't work with the latest kernel smbfs. -- E-Mail: BenH. Web : [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]