From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:55:12 +1000 Message-Id: <199906090055.KAA05359@tango.anu.edu.au> From: Paul Mackerras To: drow@false.org CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org In-reply-to: <19990608201614.A15209@drow.res.cmu.edu> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 8 Jun 1999 20:16:14 -0400) Subject: Re: Q: control is a C&T 65550? Reply-to: Paul.Mackerras@cs.anu.edu.au References: <19990608095844.A5496@drow.res.cmu.edu> <19990608101236.A5738@drow.res.cmu.edu> <199906082354.JAA05316@tango.anu.edu.au> <19990608201614.A15209@drow.res.cmu.edu> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Ahah, xmon might be quite useful here. Also, were I to browse Darwin, > would I be able to use that information? Have those licence problems > ever been straightened out? I don't see that there are any licence problems. It's open source, after all. You don't have to sign any NDA. The licence is OK as you're not going to redistribute or even use it, you're just going to read it, and ideas/knowledge/facts aren't covered by copyright. Anyway, I think Apple is (slowly) coming to see that the availability of Linux for their machines is an advantage, not a threat. Paul. [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]