linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: jpeters@phx.mcd.mot.com
Subject: Re: Motorola Web Site
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:36:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199907281336.PAA20067@denx.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:54:03 +0200." <m119OXL-0000WZC@tri-yann.crf.canon.fr>


In message <m119OXL-0000WZC@tri-yann.crf.canon.fr> you write:
> 
> While it is nce to have motorola *effectively* supporting linux

Yes - thanks, Motorola!

> may I make the follwoing comments :
> 
>     1) The form you need to fill to access patches is quite
>     painfull and if the purpose is only to notify users of
>     patch changes, then email would be sufficient...

Agreed. I do not like at all being forced to supply such  information
if I want or not. Please remove this!

You may add a link where anybody who *wants* notifications of changed
*may* register, but please do not try to force us!

An additional disadvantage  of  the  current  interface  is  that  it
disallows for automatic downloads using wget or similar tools.

>     2) The patch for 2.2.10 is 1.5 MB. It could have been 
>     compressed!!!

;-)

3) Is Motorola going to extend it's Linux support to the embedded controllers
   (MPC8xx, MPX82xx) ?

4) Running a diff against the original 2.2.10 distribution results in
   *all* files  being  different;  why  were  all  the  $Id$  strings
   changed?

   For instance - I guess there were not  so  many  changes  for  the
   Alpha prom code:

   -> diff linux-2.2.10/arch/mips/sgi/prom/misc.c linux_mot/arch/mips/sgi/prom/misc.c
   1c1
   < /* $Id: misc.c,v 1.6 1998/07/08 15:59:13 ralf Exp $
   ---
   > /* $Id: misc.c,v 1.3 1998/11/10 02:14:56 jpeters Exp $

   This makes it basicly impossible to find  out  what  *really*  was
   changed.

Wolfgang

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: -88  Home: -86  Email: wd@denx.muc.de
"Summit meetings tend to be like panda matings. The expectations  are
always high, and the results usually disappointing."   - Robert Orben

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

  reply	other threads:[~1999-07-28 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-07-27 22:05 Motorola Web Site Johnnie Peters
1999-07-27 21:25 ` Tim Waugh
1999-07-28  7:54 ` VALETTE Eric
1999-07-28 13:36   ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
1999-07-28 20:05     ` Matt Porter
1999-08-06 21:20       ` Dave Wolfe
1999-07-29 14:03 ` Alan Cox
1999-07-29 14:03 ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <4575832C8E71D111AC4100A0C96B512704A633F5@fmsmsx36.fm.intel.com>
1999-07-27 23:33 ` Johnnie Peters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199907281336.PAA20067@denx.muc.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=jpeters@phx.mcd.mot.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).