From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 11:50:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990802115034.A16484@them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99080211313600.00413@localhost.localdomain>; from kbhend on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:21:19AM -0400
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:21:19AM -0400, kbhend wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> > Kevin, Franz, et.al,
> >
> > Earlier this year, Metrowerks and I signed the copyright assignments
> > required by the FSF. Beginning August 9, I will be starting work at
> > Cygnus as a GDB engineer. One of the things that I'll work on is a
> > merge of my patches into the current gdb mainline. It'll be my goal
> > to get a solid, usable gdb up and running on Linux/PPC again.
>
> Congrats! It is good to hear from you again! We still miss you on the LinuxPPC
> JDK porting team! Care to rejoin?!? :-)
>
> As for gdb, something changed seriously between Paul's 2.2.1 kernel running on
> a R4.1 build (gdb was very very stable when debugging shared libs) and Paul's
> 2.2.10 kernel running LinuxPPC R5 or YDL.
Could you possibly try booting 2.2.1 on this R5 or YDL system? I'd
like to isolate this from kernel or userland problem.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-08-02 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-08-01 13:01 current recommended versions of glibc/egcs/binutils for R5? R Shapiro
1999-08-01 13:58 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 18:38 ` gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools Kevin B. Hendricks
1999-08-01 19:03 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 20:12 ` kbhend
1999-08-01 20:24 ` Kevin Buettner
1999-08-01 20:54 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-02 11:20 ` Gary Thomas
1999-08-02 15:21 ` kbhend
1999-08-02 15:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
1999-08-02 16:01 ` kbhend
1999-08-22 15:09 ` bug in glibc 2.1.2 new semaphore functions in libpthread? Kevin Hendricks
1999-08-24 21:09 ` Franz Sirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19990802115034.A16484@them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).