From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 11:50:34 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools Message-ID: <19990802115034.A16484@them.org> References: <990801202455.ZM22552@redrock.lan> <99080211313600.00413@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <99080211313600.00413@localhost.localdomain>; from kbhend on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:21:19AM -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:21:19AM -0400, kbhend wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > > Kevin, Franz, et.al, > > > > Earlier this year, Metrowerks and I signed the copyright assignments > > required by the FSF. Beginning August 9, I will be starting work at > > Cygnus as a GDB engineer. One of the things that I'll work on is a > > merge of my patches into the current gdb mainline. It'll be my goal > > to get a solid, usable gdb up and running on Linux/PPC again. > > Congrats! It is good to hear from you again! We still miss you on the LinuxPPC > JDK porting team! Care to rejoin?!? :-) > > As for gdb, something changed seriously between Paul's 2.2.1 kernel running on > a R4.1 build (gdb was very very stable when debugging shared libs) and Paul's > 2.2.10 kernel running LinuxPPC R5 or YDL. Could you possibly try booting 2.2.1 on this R5 or YDL system? I'd like to isolate this from kernel or userland problem. Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/ [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]