* Re: no more processes crash [not found] <Pine.SGI.4.00.9908261904190.13884-100000@osiris.office.aol.com> @ 1999-08-27 5:48 ` Michel Lanners 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Michel Lanners @ 1999-08-27 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jackal; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On 26 Aug, this message from brad allison echoed through cyberspace: > This is a bad bug/crash. I suddenly am in a state of "No more processes". > > I'm not running much. Just about 10 aterms, netscape and aim. > [snip] > Last thing I did was started a compile of kerberos. So the last command I > ran was "make". This might not be a Linux bug, but rather a Makefile bug in kerberos. I've had this before, endless loops in a Makefile, so make restarts itself all over again, until... you found the answer ;-). Michel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art. 23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes. L-1710 Luxembourg | email mlan@cpu.lu | http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. " [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <E11KJ0t-00076W-00@mail2.zrz.tu-berlin.de>]
* Re: no more processes crash [not found] <E11KJ0t-00076W-00@mail2.zrz.tu-berlin.de> @ 1999-08-27 14:33 ` brad allison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: brad allison @ 1999-08-27 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Multiple recipients of list On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Wulf Hofbauer wrote: > > I'm not running much. Just about 10 aterms, netscape and aim. > > Are you using LinuxPPC 1999? The utempter package as distributed by LinuxPPC > is broken, xterms for example will never terminate (except by kill -9) and > will fill up entries in the process table. I don't know if LinuxPPC has a > fix for it (I doubt it), but you'll find the fix at www.redhat.com. Anyone know if there's a fix for this? I searched on lists.linuxppc.org for utempter and found no mention of this problem. I found rpm updates for utempter on www.redhat.com for i386, sparc, and alpha but not for linuxppc. -b -- AOL SAPI 703.265.0908 AIM:jackal242 http://jackal.fudge.org `I was never more certain of how far away I was from my goal than when I was standing right beside it.' - Ethan Hawke, Gattaca [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <Pine.SGI.4.00.9908271030280.15912-100000@osiris.office.aol.co m>]
* Re: no more processes crash [not found] <Pine.SGI.4.00.9908271030280.15912-100000@osiris.office.aol.co m> @ 1999-09-12 20:15 ` brad allison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: brad allison @ 1999-09-12 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Multiple recipients of list I found the bug here. AIM (tik) tries to play a sound whenever you get an Instant Message. I just noticed that sound is not working on my box. So all these IM sounds got queued up and hung, resulting in a no more processes error. Now I'm not sure why sound doesn't work. I have a G3 rev2 B&W running Shaw's 2.2.6 kernel. aumix doesn't seem to be working correctly: [jackal@isis ~]$ aumix -q vol 216, 88 speaker 216, 88 line 0, 0, P mic 0, 0, P cd 0, 0, R pcm2 15, 0 [jackal@isis ~]$ aumix -v 0 0 [jackal@isis ~]$ aumix -p 0 0 [jackal@isis ~]$ aumix -q vol 216, 88 speaker 216, 88 line 0, 0, P mic 0, 0, P cd 0, 0, R pcm2 15, 0 On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, brad allison wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Wulf Hofbauer wrote: > > > > I'm not running much. Just about 10 aterms, netscape and aim. > > > > Are you using LinuxPPC 1999? The utempter package as distributed by LinuxPPC > > is broken, xterms for example will never terminate (except by kill -9) and > > will fill up entries in the process table. I don't know if LinuxPPC has a > > fix for it (I doubt it), but you'll find the fix at www.redhat.com. > > Anyone know if there's a fix for this? > > I searched on lists.linuxppc.org for utempter and found no mention of this > problem. > > I found rpm updates for utempter on www.redhat.com for i386, sparc, and > alpha but not for linuxppc. > > -b -- AOL SAPI jackal@aol.net jackal@kmfms.com 703.265.0908 AIM:jackal242 http://jackal.fudge.org `I was never more certain of how far away I was from my goal than when I was standing right beside it.' - Ethan Hawke, Gattaca ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-09-12 20:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.SGI.4.00.9908261904190.13884-100000@osiris.office.aol.com>
1999-08-27 5:48 ` no more processes crash Michel Lanners
[not found] <E11KJ0t-00076W-00@mail2.zrz.tu-berlin.de>
1999-08-27 14:33 ` brad allison
[not found] <Pine.SGI.4.00.9908271030280.15912-100000@osiris.office.aol.co m>
1999-09-12 20:15 ` brad allison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).