From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:21:31 +1000 Message-Id: <199908310721.RAA17352@tango.anu.edu.au> From: Paul Mackerras To: ddkilzer@computer.org CC: Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch, schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de, linux-mac68k@mac.linux-m68k.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org In-reply-to: (ddkilzer@computer.org) Subject: Re: mac-2.3.14.diff: adb Reply-to: Paul.Mackerras@cs.anu.edu.au References: <199908301552.RAA23128@lxp03.cern.ch> (message from Jes Sorensen on Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:52:45 +0200) <199908270917.LAA04250@lxp03.cern.ch> <199908271414.QAA24261@lxp03.cern.ch> <37CAA6F5.D93A168B@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> <199908301552.RAA23128@lxp03.cern.ch> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: David D. Kilzer wrote: > The issue at hand is that Jes believes drivers/macintosh should not exist I still haven't heard why. I personally would like something more compelling than "Jes doesn't like it" before changing an arrangement that is working just fine AFAICS. > I would appreciate it if Jes and Paul would come to an agreement on where > the code belongs so we can get on with the ADB merger. :^) Jes is more of a "theoretician" than I am, I tend to be more pragmatic, so this could be a problem. :-) I will accept patches for drivers/macintosh from the m68k mac folks. I have some reservations about the current adb merge patches, though, which I'll mention once I've had a closer look at the patches. In general I'm happy with a drivers/adb directory but I don't think drivers/macintosh should go away. Paul. [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]