From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 09:25:45 -0500 From: Shaw Terwilliger To: Hugh Caley Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Paul's devel branch on Lombard? Message-ID: <19990909092545.C4200@io.nu> References: <37D74322.B787B9FE@loomer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <37D74322.B787B9FE@loomer.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hugh Caley wrote: > I have not had this problem with building Paul's 2.2.12 kernel. I did not use > a config file from a previous version, which sounds like the major difference > between us. The problem is not with the 2.2.12 kernel, but with the 2.3.16 branch in his "devel" archive. The "stable" branch is working like a champ for me. I'm sorry if I didn't make that very clear in my message (I had just spent three minutes writing down all those addresses). :) > Or: which version of gcc are you using? I'm using the gcc from the fsirl > directory on dev.linuxppc.org, and the glibc and related files from the same > site. If it matters, I'm using GCC from the Debian Potato branch (which I have installed). I believe it's just EGCS 1.1.2 release; but it's building 2.2.12 great, 2.3.16 just isn't building. I guess it's possible there's a 2.3 kernel problem with the compiler, although I don't see any problems in the builds. Has anyone built kernels (either 2.2 or 2.3) with GCC 2.95? I'd build a new compiler (even just to try) if I could build the newest one. :P -- Shaw Terwilliger (sterwill@io.nu) ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/