From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <19990913214700.8213.rocketmail@web1002.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Bethe Subject: Re: hfs resource forks in Linux To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > *) I saw a message on linux-kernel in which A. Sun, > the maintainer of > the hfs code, said that it's on his todo list, but > right now "on the > back burner". If that's true and nobody else steps > in, we won't see HFS+ > support in this century either. That's a bummer, because HFS+ is currently the only filesystem I've thought of which is robustly usable among all three of MacOS 8, MacOS X, and Linux. I want one that has multiuser and secure (permissions) properties. UFS seems to do for Linux and MacOS X, but what about MacOS 8? I have a 2 GB disk in my low-end Powerbook Wallstreet II, so I need to share among OS's! ;) === "We can learn from the past, but those days are gone. We can hope for the future, but there may not be one." -- http://www.dreamtheater.net/songb5.htm#VI1 ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/