From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:48:27 -0500 From: Shaw Terwilliger To: Martin Costabel Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [patch] Paul's rsync kernel compile fix Message-ID: <19990925114827.B8312@io.nu> References: <19990924222214.A7489@io.nu> <37EC952C.9285EA6C@wanadoo.fr> <19990925110256.A8137@io.nu> <37ECF9A9.10B58B88@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <37ECF9A9.10B58B88@wanadoo.fr> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Martin Costabel wrote: > Oh, I see. We are indeed not talking about the same thing. I have the > development tree (2.3.18), and there arch/ppc/kernel/pmac_setup.c does > include . > What if you just plug a "#include " in there? But then I > don't know whether the declarations in question are there in this > version. Yep, dma.h holds the declarations, and sticking it in pmac_setup.c corrects my problems. I thought there must have been a much more complicated solution because I couldn't imagine I was the only one seeing this error. :) > BTW, Paul's 2.3.18 compiles cleanly (and boots, in contrast to the > 2.3.18 version from the cvs tree at openprojects), at least if HFS > support is switched off. I've got 2.2.12 working very nicely with my Lombard, and generally I'm aware of the differences between stable/dev kernels, but is there anything really cool in 2.3.18 for the PPC (from Paul's archive) that might lead me to switch to it? -- Shaw Terwilliger (sterwill@io.nu) ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/