From: Michel Lanners <mlan@cpu.lu>
To: dje@watson.ibm.com
Cc: khendricks@admin.ivey.uwo.ca, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.13 build OOB?; need for some standardization here?
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:04:29 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199909301804.UAA00292@piglet.cpu.lu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9909281839.AA40920@marc.watson.ibm.com>
Hi all,
On 28 Sep, this message from David Edelsohn echoed through cyberspace:
> Kevin> I think we should either fix the way Linus and company decides when to release a
> Kevin> stable version, or get our own "Alan Cox" to act as shepard over our own stable
> Kevin> "ppc" kernel tree and make that person "official".
>
> I tend to agree with Kevin here. The Linux core kernel developers
> need to improve their release engineering process. I realize that
> Linux/PPC was on the fringe for a long time, and both Paul and Cort have
> done a lot of excellent work these past few months adding functionality
> and improving the overall design. This rapid development makes it hard
> for Linus and company to keep up. However, x86 development should not
> break PowerPC and other ports as much as I have seen.
I fully agree here. I think every Linux arch should have a single person
responsible for the port, and new releases of stable kernel versions
should get every arch maintainer's OK before release. That would at
least catch most of the 'doesn't compile on...' type of bugs.
However, I fear that Paul, the current PPC maintainer according to
kernel documentation, would need to spend even more time on Linux
than he currently does... which I'm not sure he is prepared to do.
> PowerPC and other architectures are becoming more important and
> demonstrating the diversity of Linux. The breakage and instability does
> not cast a good light on bazaar-style development model and Linux when we
> are trying to broaden the Linux market.
Absolutely true. There are two main problems I see here: getting PPC
patches into the kernel, and checking that other people's work on the
kernel doesn't break anything PPC-specific. Both problems caused
headaches in the past...
Michel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art.
23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes.
L-1710 Luxembourg |
email mlan@cpu.lu |
http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. "
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-30 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-28 18:08 2.2.13 build OOB?; need for some standardization here? Kevin_Hendricks
1999-09-28 18:39 ` David Edelsohn
1999-09-30 18:04 ` Michel Lanners [this message]
[not found] <99092914301001.09002@argo.anu.edu.au>
1999-09-29 8:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-09-28 15:20 Kevin_Hendricks
1999-09-28 16:15 ` Sriranga Veeraraghavan
1999-09-28 16:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-09-28 17:27 ` Sriranga Veeraraghavan
1999-09-28 17:45 ` Hollis R Blanchard
1999-09-28 20:34 ` Deirdre Saoirse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199909301804.UAA00292@piglet.cpu.lu \
--to=mlan@cpu.lu \
--cc=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=khendricks@admin.ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).