Re: Porting RapidIO from ppc arch to powerpc arch in support of MPC8641D

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

> OK, but if the device tree is not allowed to dictate policy, to use
> Segher's term, just hardware characteristics, how does that help us get
> the embedded soc kernels away from being designed and built to specific
> demo/eval board setups and make them more configurable?

I don't see the problem really.  Could you point out one
specific problem, and then we solve it?  Repeat as necessary.

> I got the impression that to some extent thats how you/we/?? were 
> trying
> to use the dts stuff. If my board is exactly like freescales xyz demo
> board except I move my rio map to here, my pci map to here, change a 
> few
> sizes etc., why do I have to go and patchup the arch setup code, modify
> ppc_md routines, etc.

That shouldn't be necessary.

> Isn't the plan that I just edit the dts, compile
> with dtc and have u-boot pass in the dtb to the stock kernel and its
> boots on my board?

Mostly, yes.

> If dts can't do this because its not allowed policy statements then 
> what
> will do this?

You pass policy decisions to the kernel some other way.  Like,
on the kernel command line, for example.

> Segher is right,

Yes, I always am.

> Please I'm not trying to start up any previous turf wars here,

Much appreciated!

--

Okay, if I am to help at all here, please someone explain what
"law"s and mboxes and doorbells are (in the context of rapidio).
Also how they are used, etc.


Segher