From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com (dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com [157.254.234.139]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA51068404 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:12:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (unknown [157.254.92.62]) by dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA71291 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364E3B725 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from indyvss3.am.thmulti.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indyvss3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20377-01-13 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay2.indy.tce.com (smtprelay2.indy.tce.com [157.254.96.95]) by indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752BF3B70D for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from boulsmailbh02.eu.thmulti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay2.indy.tce.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j8S8C4gx018716 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:08 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:12:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D4F0DF7@rennsmail02.eu.thmulti.com> From: "Fillod Stephane" To: Subject: RE: How to use SPE on MPC8541 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Bonjour G=E9rard, G=E9rard Gu=E9vel wrote: >I don't especially want to see if the bit is set, I just want >to improve the board performance for a Linux application :-). Do you know where your CPU is spending much of its time? It looks like a job for OProfile. Support for e500 exists in 2.6.x=20 thanks to the fine folks of Freescale. We appreciate their involvement=20 in OSS community. >To check the performance, I used the Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark=20 I like the lmbench microbenchmark too. It depends on what profile is your application (instruction mix, library calls, cache usage, = paging,..) >with the standard glibc (strcpy, strcmp, ...) on one part, and with >the freescale SPE library on the other part (vstrcpy, vstrcmp, ...). Will the SPE enhanced C library calls will be integrated in Glibc one = day?=20 Regards, Stephane