linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ljp <ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: cforno12@linux.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	ricklind@linux.ibm.com, dnbanerg@us.ibm.com,
	Linuxppc-dev
	<linuxppc-dev-bounces+ljp=linux.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] ibmvnic: Do not replenish RX buffers after every polling loop
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:43:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a4e7b1ef1fb101cbb26fb9d5867ee46@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605748345-32062-10-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>

On 2020-11-18 19:12, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> From: "Dwip N. Banerjee" <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
> 
> Reduce the amount of time spent replenishing RX buffers by
> only doing so once available buffers has fallen under a certain
> threshold, in this case half of the total number of buffers, or
> if the polling loop exits before the packets processed is less
> than its budget.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dwip N. Banerjee <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index 96df6d8fa277..9fe43ab0496d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -2537,7 +2537,10 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct
> *napi, int budget)
>  		frames_processed++;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (adapter->state != VNIC_CLOSING)
> +	if (adapter->state != VNIC_CLOSING &&
> +	    ((atomic_read(&adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num].available) <
> +	      adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq / 2) ||
> +	      frames_processed < budget))

1/2 seems a simple and good algorithm.
Explaining why "frames_process < budget" is necessary in the commit 
message
or source code also helps.


>  		replenish_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num]);
>  	if (frames_processed < budget) {
>  		if (napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-19  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19  1:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] ibmvnic: Performance improvements and other updates Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] ibmvnic: Introduce indirect subordinate Command Response Queue buffer Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  9:34   ` ljp
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] ibmvnic: Introduce batched RX buffer descriptor transmission Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] ibmvnic: Introduce xmit_more support using batched subCRQ hcalls Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] ibmvnic: Clean up TX code and TX buffer data structure Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] ibmvnic: Remove send_subcrq function Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  9:37   ` ljp
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] ibmvnic: Ensure that device queue memory is cache-line aligned Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] ibmvnic: Correctly re-enable interrupts in NAPI polling routine Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] ibmvnic: Use netdev_alloc_skb instead of alloc_skb to replenish RX buffers Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  9:47   ` ljp
2020-11-19  1:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] ibmvnic: Do not replenish RX buffers after every polling loop Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19  9:43   ` ljp [this message]
2020-11-19 20:26     ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-19 20:38       ` ljp
2020-11-19 20:58         ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-21  3:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] ibmvnic: Performance improvements and other updates Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a4e7b1ef1fb101cbb26fb9d5867ee46@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cforno12@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dnbanerg@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev-bounces+ljp=linux.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).