From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1922C433FE for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NDN00214Jz3dvM for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 03:43:44 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=is4sSZob; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=is4sSZob; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=bristot@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=is4sSZob; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=is4sSZob; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NDMyv4nkWz3cMs for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 03:42:45 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668789760; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iCeupirs0oRwfAYdrtKDNR33oxtw0kRHF9WhmcxURbs=; b=is4sSZobXPguOsrAJb7JAyhMO5SpS8UcYWAE+R5d34fjCAKvqtZg6QBIcFoLw5h6mr3RCt 5EPAB+vTGhKztvDccZH+7yoUS2r4oeOVsIgMWRoR4f+xF1kMvXGjusdUOr+rokCcXgyAxz YUK1G/bzc2+QiGQxJI9KYRjL7cpX4AI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668789760; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iCeupirs0oRwfAYdrtKDNR33oxtw0kRHF9WhmcxURbs=; b=is4sSZobXPguOsrAJb7JAyhMO5SpS8UcYWAE+R5d34fjCAKvqtZg6QBIcFoLw5h6mr3RCt 5EPAB+vTGhKztvDccZH+7yoUS2r4oeOVsIgMWRoR4f+xF1kMvXGjusdUOr+rokCcXgyAxz YUK1G/bzc2+QiGQxJI9KYRjL7cpX4AI= Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-533-YrJx8rbqPZy9fTs_iNnZ8g-1; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:42:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YrJx8rbqPZy9fTs_iNnZ8g-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id y20-20020a056402271400b004630f3a32c3so3273641edd.15 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:42:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iCeupirs0oRwfAYdrtKDNR33oxtw0kRHF9WhmcxURbs=; b=MAulsYcPbJSkc/kATwcxhGb0hlgdSkj5p94KwH8gPIGjMzBkeDGahiPL/v87ZIjn9s 07ewSVG9YUj+WwADUw4N20HcWmNiJEgi8c5vHY7lP7SKwlvwe6y6iw+6Ms9yS4yowjnv r5g6nwhI3zTIThitKEP3OtvouwERFdo9IRCGewInx1kne8e5MiOGLV/ptxDN//ah8DxB DS83V4+EGWOPQM6v75v6nnn4UPiXpf8R7iPsdyQvDeUnzpL20rWR1WioUoL1DpaPIITR De/05uuGPYP8EBuVn5Lp/m/WacbBI+xvSJGbOEanyecUIycm/MTeAEGVTY2B/0AZKFIJ B9tg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnEbys4rlgJ+8eTV1qrUYdCPvvAsF/GHIIaJuaCBC9T8SishOr9 eJp8yk9vH0JqIy4wwsKNMG9hrMpQYlX60Lh5t9OySn7mPgyraiqYJI1AQgNdxr6SaYEnM8ApTDf GJaiftlAgC5quXnUYskJwjWHv4A== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4cf:0:b0:461:a9ce:5408 with SMTP id t15-20020aa7d4cf000000b00461a9ce5408mr6997415edr.201.1668789757506; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5TaV9WywAgyEkJUjIKk83rbFXBQR8khfDHnlKNNSiUU8k8aohx0CjQn5lly7hEq5+W3BWrVw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4cf:0:b0:461:a9ce:5408 with SMTP id t15-20020aa7d4cf000000b00461a9ce5408mr6997376edr.201.1668789757207; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.46] (host-95-248-159-81.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.248.159.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a1709063caa00b0073d83f80b05sm1912134ejh.94.2022.11.18.08.42.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:42:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1ab5082c-bec5-53f2-501b-f15f7e8edbd9@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:42:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI To: Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider References: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com> <20221102183336.3120536-7-vschneid@redhat.com> From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juri Lelli , Mark Rutland , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Dave Hansen , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Russell King , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov , Nicholas Piggin , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel. org, Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11/18/22 10:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:45:29PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: > >>> + if (trace_ipi_send_cpumask_enabled()) { >>> + call_single_data_t *csd; >>> + smp_call_func_t func; >>> + >>> + csd = container_of(node, call_single_data_t, node.llist); >>> + >>> + func = sched_ttwu_pending; >>> + if (CSD_TYPE(csd) != CSD_TYPE_TTWU) >>> + func = csd->func; >>> + >>> + if (raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node)) >>> + trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, func); >> So I went with the tracepoint being placed *before* the actual IPI gets >> sent to have a somewhat sane ordering between trace_ipi_send_cpumask() and >> e.g. trace_call_function_single_entry(). >> >> Packaging the call_single_queue logic makes the code less horrible, but it >> does mix up the event ordering... > Keeps em sharp ;-) > Having the trace before the IPI avoids the (non ideal) case where the trace stops because of an IPI execution before we have trace about who sent it... :-(. -- Daniel