[PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>

[PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>

[Rupjyoti Sarmah]

Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
index cd56bb5..3f86564 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
@@ -163,6 +163,14 @@
 			interrupts = <0x1e 4>;
 		};
 
+		SATA0: sata@bffd1000 {
+			compatible = "amcc,sata-460ex";
+			reg = <4 0xbffd1000 0x800 4 0xbffd0800 0x400>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&UIC3>;
+			interrupts = <0x0 0x4       /* SATA */
+				      0x5 0x4>;     /* AHBDMA */
+		};
+
 		POB0: opb {
 			compatible = "ibm,opb-460ex", "ibm,opb";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
1.5.6.3

Re: [PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:33:12PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>
>Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
>Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>

You sent this same patch twice.  Mistake, or was there supposed to be a
difference?

josh

RE: [PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>

[Rupjyoti Sarmah]

Hi Josh,

There was a suggestion from Sergei, I incorporated and resubmitted.

Regards,
Rup

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:18 AM
To: Rupjyoti Sarmah
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; sr@denx.de; rsarmah@apm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC
SATA<resubmission>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:33:12PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>
>Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
>Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>

You sent this same patch twice.  Mistake, or was there supposed to be a
difference?

josh
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, 
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information 
that is confidential and proprietary to AppliedMicro Corporation or its subsidiaries. 
It is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the parties' business relationship. 
All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

[PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>

[Rupjyoti Sarmah]

Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@appliedmicro.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
index cd56bb5..3f86564 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts
@@ -163,6 +163,14 @@
 			interrupts = <0x1e 4>;
 		};
 
+		SATA0: sata@bffd1000 {
+			compatible = "amcc,sata-460ex";
+			reg = <4 0xbffd1000 0x800 4 0xbffd0800 0x400>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&UIC3>;
+			interrupts = <0x0 0x4       /* SATA */
+				      0x5 0x4>;     /* AHBDMA */
+		};
+
 		POB0: opb {
 			compatible = "ibm,opb-460ex", "ibm,opb";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
1.5.6.3