linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:16:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f85dc8e6a0149677563a2dfb4cef9a9c7eaa391.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com>

There are several ways to make sure might_fault
calling function does not sleep.
One is to use it on kernel or otherwise locked memory - apparently
nfs/sunrpc does this. As noted by Ingo, this is handled by the
migh_fault() implementation in mm/memory.c but not the one in
linux/kernel.h so in the current code might_fault() schedules
differently depending on CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, which is an undesired
semantical side effect.

Another is to call pagefault_disable: in this case the page fault
handler will go to fixups processing and we get an error instead of
sleeping, so the might_sleep annotation is a false positive.
vhost driver wants to do this now in order to reuse socket ops
under a spinlock (and fall back on slower thread handler
on error).

Address both issues by:
	- dropping the unconditional call to might_sleep
	  from the fast might_fault code in linux/kernel.h
	- checking for pagefault_disable() in the
	  CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING implementation

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/kernel.h |  1 -
 mm/memory.c            | 14 +++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index e96329c..322b065 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ void might_fault(void);
 #else
 static inline void might_fault(void)
 {
-	might_sleep();
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6dc1882..1b8327b 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4222,13 +4222,17 @@ void might_fault(void)
 	if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
 		return;
 
-	might_sleep();
 	/*
-	 * it would be nicer only to annotate paths which are not under
-	 * pagefault_disable, however that requires a larger audit and
-	 * providing helpers like get_user_atomic.
+	 * It would be nicer to annotate paths which are under preempt_disable
+	 * but not under pagefault_disable, however that requires a new flag
+	 * for differentiating between the two.
 	 */
-	if (!in_atomic() && current->mm)
+	if (in_atomic())
+		return;
+
+	might_sleep();
+
+	if (current->mm)
 		might_lock_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(might_fault);
-- 
MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-16 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-16 11:07 [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] asm-generic: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] frv: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] m32r: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] microblaze: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mn10300: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 13:59   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:00     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:11       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:30         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tile: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:33   ` Chris Metcalf
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-05-16 18:40   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-19  9:35     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 12:34       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 13:34         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 16:06           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 16:40             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 20:23               ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 20:35                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 11:18               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22  9:47         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:16           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 20:38         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 20:36     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22  9:58   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 11:07     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 11:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 13:41   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-22 14:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:44       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] powerpc: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f85dc8e6a0149677563a2dfb4cef9a9c7eaa391.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org \
    --cc=linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).