From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:16:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f85dc8e6a0149677563a2dfb4cef9a9c7eaa391.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com>
There are several ways to make sure might_fault
calling function does not sleep.
One is to use it on kernel or otherwise locked memory - apparently
nfs/sunrpc does this. As noted by Ingo, this is handled by the
migh_fault() implementation in mm/memory.c but not the one in
linux/kernel.h so in the current code might_fault() schedules
differently depending on CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, which is an undesired
semantical side effect.
Another is to call pagefault_disable: in this case the page fault
handler will go to fixups processing and we get an error instead of
sleeping, so the might_sleep annotation is a false positive.
vhost driver wants to do this now in order to reuse socket ops
under a spinlock (and fall back on slower thread handler
on error).
Address both issues by:
- dropping the unconditional call to might_sleep
from the fast might_fault code in linux/kernel.h
- checking for pagefault_disable() in the
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING implementation
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 1 -
mm/memory.c | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index e96329c..322b065 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ void might_fault(void);
#else
static inline void might_fault(void)
{
- might_sleep();
}
#endif
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6dc1882..1b8327b 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4222,13 +4222,17 @@ void might_fault(void)
if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
return;
- might_sleep();
/*
- * it would be nicer only to annotate paths which are not under
- * pagefault_disable, however that requires a larger audit and
- * providing helpers like get_user_atomic.
+ * It would be nicer to annotate paths which are under preempt_disable
+ * but not under pagefault_disable, however that requires a new flag
+ * for differentiating between the two.
*/
- if (!in_atomic() && current->mm)
+ if (in_atomic())
+ return;
+
+ might_sleep();
+
+ if (current->mm)
might_lock_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(might_fault);
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 11:07 [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] asm-generic: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] frv: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] m32r: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] microblaze: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mn10300: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 13:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tile: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:33 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-05-16 18:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-19 9:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 12:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 16:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 20:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 20:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 20:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 9:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-22 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] powerpc: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f85dc8e6a0149677563a2dfb4cef9a9c7eaa391.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).