From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:06:28 -0700 From: Cort Dougan To: Dan Malek Cc: Brendan.Simon@ctam.com.au, linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: linuxppc-embedded: main kernel tree Message-ID: <20000127150628.U14218@hq.fsmlabs.com> References: <388F3D65.3B420FED@ctam.com.au> <388F18F5.BDE5D395@netx4.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <388F18F5.BDE5D395@netx4.com>; from Dan Malek on Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 10:55:33AM -0500 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: I have no trouble. Send me mail with the error and we can get you going again. } The "main" tree is really the 2.3.xx tree right now, and all of } the 8xx support is there. For some reason, the BitKeeper 2.3.41 } version doesn't build. I fixed a couple of problems, but now I } am wondering if it will build for any PMac platform....... I send patches to Linus every pre-patch he releases. If he doesn't have time or is unwilling to absorb the patches for the next pre-patch that's an issue you need to take up with him... Lately he's been pretty good about absorbing things right away, though. } Every day? I have the same complaint most people have expressed } lately. I work in the BitKeeper tree, which is supposed to be } the official PPC tree and one step away from kernel.org. I can't No, you need to tell me there's a problem so we can fix it. } build it for any of my systems. I have to go looking for something } from Paul or Ben or someone else to get something to work...... ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/