linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: FASSINO Jean-Philippe
	<jeanphilippe.fassino@cnet.francetelecom.fr>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: eieio & ld_le, ld_be
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:24:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000222152443.010969@mailhost.mipsys.com> (raw)


On Tue, Feb 22, 2000, FASSINO Jean-Philippe
<jeanphilippe.fassino@cnet.francetelecom.fr> wrote:

>Just a question about ld_le* and ld_be*.
>This function do a io read and enforce in-order execution with eieio.
>
>Does eieio is really necessary when load value from IO ??
>Maybe some computer (SMP, pci, ...) require that !
>But, i try ld_* without eieio on my computer (G4) and that work well.

Neither ld_le* nor ld_be* should do any eieio (and they don't in the
kernel sources I just checked).

Howeverm in_le*/out_le* etc... do it. Those are necessary to enforce
ordering of accesses when manipulating a hardware device. It's possible
that the non-cachable & guarded state of io pages make it less important
on G3, but it's definitely necessary to be completely safe.

If you are maniuplating in-memory datas that are not related to any io
hardware device, then you don't need eieio.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-02-22 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-02-22 14:24 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2000-02-22 17:59 ` eieio & ld_le, ld_be Gabriel Paubert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-02-22 11:49 FASSINO Jean-Philippe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000222152443.010969@mailhost.mipsys.com \
    --to=bh40@calva.net \
    --cc=jeanphilippe.fassino@cnet.francetelecom.fr \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).