From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: "Timothy A. Seufert" <tas@mindspring.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: PCI I/O address problems on B&W G3
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000224121210.030675@mailhost.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <v04220801b4daa2e26f84@[10.0.0.42]>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000, Timothy A. Seufert <tas@mindspring.com> wrote:
>01:04.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899A (rev 01)
> Subsystem: Adaptec: Unknown device f620
> Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 16, IRQ 25
> BIST result: 00
> I/O ports at fe000000
> Memory at 80883000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
> Expansion ROM at 80900000 [disabled]
> Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
>
>01:04.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899A (rev 01)
> Subsystem: Adaptec: Unknown device f620
> Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 16
> BIST result: 00
> I/O ports at fe000000
> Memory at 80882000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
> Expansion ROM at 808e0000 [disabled]
> Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Hum... Both cards are behind the PCI<->PCI bridges, and so they should
both have io addresses in the range fe001000 -> fe001fff
The fact that they are at fe000000 seems to indicate that the io base
address is 0 (and so was apparently _not_ assigned at all). Could you
break into OF, dev to those devices, and send me the output of
.properties ? (I need the content of the "reg" and "assigned addresses"
properties). I want to see what OF did with the cards exactly.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-24 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-24 9:43 PCI I/O address problems on B&W G3 Timothy A. Seufert
2000-02-24 11:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2000-02-24 22:13 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-02 14:22 ` Need reports about PCI I/O conflicts Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-02 14:41 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-03-03 5:13 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 10:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-17 7:01 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 8:39 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-03 8:57 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 10:01 ` Michel Lanners
2000-03-03 11:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-04 10:16 ` PCI I/O address problems on B&W G3 Michel Lanners
2000-03-04 12:15 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-05 21:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000224121210.030675@mailhost.mipsys.com \
--to=bh40@calva.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=tas@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).